Albert of Saxe-Coburg

Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (Francis Albert Augustus Charles Emmanuel;[1] 26 August 1819 – 14 December 1861) 

Hwas the husband and consort of Queen Victoria.
He was born in the Saxon duchy of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, to a family connected to many of Europe's ruling monarchs. At the age of 20, he married his first cousin, Queen Victoria; they had nine children. Initially he felt constrained by his role of consort, which did not afford him any power or responsibilities, but gradually developed a reputation for supporting many public causes, such as educational reform and the abolition of slavery worldwide, and was entrusted with running the Queen's household, office and estates. He was heavily involved with the organisation of the Great Exhibition of 1851, which was a resounding success.
Victoria came to depend more and more on his support and guidance. He aided the development of Britain's constitutional monarchy by persuading his wife to be less partisan in her dealings with Parliament—although he actively disagreed with the interventionist foreign policy pursued during Lord Palmerston's tenure as Foreign Secretary. In 1857, he was given the formal title of Prince Consort.
Albert died at the relatively young age of 42, plunging the Queen into deep mourning. On her death in 1901, their eldest son succeeded as Edward VII, the first British monarch of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, named after the ducal house to which Albert belonged.

I)- introduction

• ASC VIRGO, ruler ME in I ;
• # SU - ME (SU in cadent XII)
• MC GEMINI, ruler ME, MA in X

ALMUTEN : MARS (followed closely by ME)

• HYLEG : none SU nor MO ; ME
• ANAERETE : SA 
• ALCHOCODEN : this chart doesn't has such a point ! So, it seams quite obvious that Hyleg is also alchocoden !

II)- directions

Died of typhoid at the age of 42 years. His son (Edward VII) had also presented this disease (in 1871) but had escaped.

1)- mundane directions

 Echo directions : Me // Sa and Sa // Me (1861) engaging Me, ruler of ASC, located in house I and Saturn.

2)- zodiacal directions

2,1)- # SU conj Me : converse direction

- parameters

-results

Important note: AR = conversion key in right ascension of the sun - EQU = conversion key on the equator of the sun - 1 / AR or 1 / EQU = inverse - PTO = Ptolemy key - Naib = Naibod key - Dir = - Z = zodiacal - M = mundane - D = direct direction - C = converse meaning (in the sense of ancient astrology) - D - AR = direction in right ascension - AO = direction in oblique ascension - Gold Regio = direction Goldmayer, Variety Placid = direction Goldmayer, variety Placidus - Symb = symbolic direction - X - 1: table of "fictitious" directions with arc x key factor - X - 2 = table of "fictitious" directions with date x key factor

The table above shows the results for all types of primary directions. In particular, the arc of zodiacal direction D Regio-Campa D = 41.59, and that the arc of the mundane direction Placidus in converse is D = 41.86. However, it is not easy to make an easy synthesis with this table, which is purely analytical. The table below tries to obviate this defect: in particular, it gives the synthesis of the directions in zodiacal, mundane, by key of conversion and by variety of direction.

a)- synthesis

 (click to enlarge)

 It is easier here to make comparisons; For reasons of space, I had to arrange two boards end to end one below the other. However, the upper table shows two zodiacal directions in D Placidus (not AR) and the other in D Regio-Campa (not EQU). The other table is the same synthesis for the mundane directions. There are three directions +, two in EQU (for D Placidus and D regio-Campa). The arcs corresponding to these directions are indicated on the right, in a small annexed table.

b)- use of "fictitious" directions

In order to make comparisons, I had to use directions other than the true primary directions: these are the directions in AR (which are recognized by some astrologers as "valid", as Max Duval), directions in AO (Which were used by astrologers such as Lilly) or the Goldmayer directions (which are some kind of symbolic global direction, little known by astrologers and of which Max Duval considers the value questionable, but HJ Gouchon seemed to recognize some interest in them). Finally, I do not insist on the symbolic directions (attention: I did not misunderstand that the directions of the MC are almost identical to the symbolic directions, "almost" ...) ; 

In order to make comparisons I was obliged to make two tables that overlap with those of the directions deemed "real", zodiacal and mundane directions. For this, I had to use in the 1st table a "classic" conversion key (arc x key) and in the other, a more exotic one by using the key x date conversion key. The working hypothesis, which in terms of statistics we call the null hypothesis, is to say that, all things being equal, we will find as many "real" directions as "fictitious" directions.

c)- result for one direction :  # SU conj Me

D – Z	2
D – M	3
X – 1	1
X – 2	1

 The table is obvious to read; This is an example. It will take many cases like this to determine whether or not a significant difference is revealed!

2)- analysis for previous direction :  Sa // Me

 In other analyses, I had not been able to fully exploit the arcs of primary directions. Indeed, Max Duval gives a method that is too inspired by that of the zodiacal directions to be truly exploitable; I had to use Makranski's algorithms. However, these require a lot of attention to the management of semi-arcs and other arcs of type (tm-ts). A sign error leads to aberrations!

 We see two mundane directions corresponding to arcs D and C Placidus.
These arcs correspond to the following directions:

for the D Placidus arc = 42.29 converted in years folloing AR = 0.919

 and for the C Placidus = 42.92 converted in years (following AR = 1.088 (1/length SU).
So, results :

results
D – Z	0
D – M	2
X – 1	0
X – 2	0

 3)- analysis for the zodiacal direction Sa conj #Lu (Campanus)

Here is another typical converse zodiacal direction: #Sa conj Lu D = 41.25 (AR key) with latitude.

- parameters

 - results

 While the Morinus software indicates only one type of direction compatible with the event, the table allows, as I said above, to analyze all directions in one piece.... You will see below the same table concerning the "fictitious" directions (see above for an explanation).

 Hence, we find :

results
D – Z	3
D – M	3
X – 1	0
X – 2	0

If we now add the intermediate results, we find:

D-Z	2	0	3		5
D-M	3	2	3		8
X-1	1	0	0		1
X-2	1	0	0		1

 Of course, for such a small number of cases, it is not possible to use an appropriate statistical tool 'even the non parametric ones); However, we show the way to an appropriate statistical evaluation of primary directions: the comparison between a homogeneous group of management deemed "giving results" and another group deemed "placebo".