Prince Charles

 Prince Charles

14 Nov 1948 GREG    CAL
sunday GREG
 | lat 51° 30' 0" | N 0°10' W
0
---------------------------------
natal (bt) 13 h 30 min
raas-rams :0h 15' 24"
reckoned bt Lat --> lmt 21 h 14 min
tu 21h 14' 28"
tsn 0h 48' 50"
---------------------------------
timezone  : 0
DST : 0 (-)
Equation of time 0h 15' 24"
ΔT 0h 0' 28"
---------------------------------
We will first look for the somatic factors of the theme: hyleg and alchocoden. We see that MO is in X, well positioned in TAU (Exaltation) in a tropical zodiac. In the sidereal zodiac, it is in ARI (Peregrine).
In global position, SA is in TRI aspect with MO and in dignity of TERM. In this occurrence, MO is HYLEG and SA is ALCHOCODEN.
In zodiac position, JU is in TRI aspect with MO but has no dignity.
The scope of this information depends on whether or not MO is hyleg and alchocoden at the same time because MO is in TAU. According to tradition, when the hyleg is SU or MO and does not have an aspect with another planet, this is the case. So it seems that here MO cannot be considered both hyleg and alchocoden.
--------------------------------------------------
HYLEG – ALCHOCODEN – domification ,

In the upper chart we see that the nativity is diurnal (or nocturnal) and the moon is waxing (waning). This immediately makes it possible to orient the search for the hyleg towards SU or MO. We then seek the point which is both in Ptolemaic aspect and in dignity with the hyleg. This is the alchocoden. In the lower table, information is given on the alchocoden point (including dignity, power, retrograde, the house situation and especially the important fact of knowing if the alchocoden point is within 5° of the next cusp, in which case it must be removed (or added if he is retrograde) a certain number of degrees (life points).Finally, it may be necessary to add points depending on the place of JU and VE in relation to the upper meridian or the rising.

ZODIACAL – MUNDANE

In our research, we hypothesized that the mundane chart alone should be considered; also we must base on the aspects taken in the semiarcs the research of the degrees likely to be considered in the duration of the life.
In the case of Prince Charles we have the table above which allows us to estimate the breakdown of aspects between the different planets and the alchocoden.
When considering a theme, the first thing is to observe whether it is diurnal or nocturnal. In the case of Prince Charles, it is .
In this case, the first point to check is SU. If  SU is well disposed, it can claim 1st stage to be HYLEG.

SU is P and therefore seems weak, with a dignity score of [-3],
But, when we look for the dignities that appear in the zodiacal inscription of MO, we find none.
we find at least one aspect to match with the dignities
We'll see later what we get when we search for mundane dignities.
Now that we doubt to take SU as hyleg, we are left with MO we find aspect to match with the dignities

Now that we doubt to take MO as hyleg, we are left with the choice of ASC and that of POF. It is the way in which is laid out MO which will indicate the choice to us. If MO is waxing, we take ASC for hyleg ; if MO is waning, we take POF for hyleg,


Now we must look for the alchocoden: it is the planet which has the maximum dignity with regard to the hyleg and which exchanges a Ptolemaic aspect with the hyleg.
if we consider the ZODIACAL system, we observe a trigone aspect of JU.
but JU has no dignity with MO
So we have two possibilities with our hypothesis : first choose MO for hyleg ; second choose the MUNDANE system and try to find another couple of hyleg/alchocoden,
If we choose now MO we must know that Dorotheus, Al Qabisi, and Ptolemy, agree with this choice
In case of MO is the Hyleg, there is then one candidate to be the alchocoden: JU
 but there is no dignity and one aspect
so, MO can't be both alchocoden and hyleg
However, JU is [Ru] and has a power of [2], JU has a Kadkhudah score of [2]
JU is located at 269,9° at more than 5° from [Δ degrees cups sup [V] : 22,23° (120)] and has a domitude regio of : [142,23] for a latitude of [0,07°]
Now, we have to take account of the radix zodiacal aspects,
------------------------------------------------------
 MO 120 JU: 21,64     
------------------------------------------------------
Without any change, we find with JU as Kadhkhudah : Y = 45 as a result of JU SUCCEDENT years
#N/D
------------------------------------------------------
So, zodiacal Y =77,89

THEME

SU is P with a [-5] score
MO is E with a [8] score
VE is Ru  with a [18] score
JU is Ru with a [10] score

MA is P with a [-14] score

SA is T with a [6] score


we see below the list of  aspects :
---------------------------------------
                                 JU 120 MO Oc                    SA 60 ME Oc                        
---------------------------------------
#N/D


The traditional almuten (Omar, Ibn Ezra) is SA
we see below the list of dignities for SA :
---------------------------------------
[ term 1 tri 3 rul 1 exn 0 fac 1 ]
[ su 0 mo 3 asc 0 syg 0 pof 2 ]
---------------------------------------
Note 1 : the ‘almuten figuris’ is the lord of the chart, but its determination obeys somewhat different rules according to the schools. The tradition is based above all on the zodiacal dignities. (see p,e,  Alcabitius, Introduction, 59-61, 117 and Avenezra, Nativites, 101) – almuten = al-mu’tazz (arabic term)
[7] As for the governor which is the <planet> predominating (al-mubtazz) over the birth from which one indicates the conditions of the native after the haylāğ and the kadhudāh,n it is the planet having the most leadership in the ascendant, the position<s> of the two luminaries, the position of the Lot of Fortune and the position of the degree of the conjunction or opposition which precedes the birth. When a planet has mastery over two, three or four positions by the abundance of its shares in them, it is the governor and the predominant <planet> (al-mubtazz) and the indicator after the haylāğ and the kadhudāh. From it one indicates the conditions of the native. Some people use it instead of the kadhudāh in giving life.  [Al-Qabisi , Charles Burnett, Keji Yamamoto, Michio Yano, The Introduction to Astrology, IV, 7, p, 117, Warburg, 2004]
Note 2 : There are at least 4 systems for determining the almuten depending on whether the combinations of triplicities and terms are used: the Ptolemaic almuten (followed by Lilly) with Ptolemaic terms ; the same with Egyptian terms; the almuten of Dorotheus with Ptolemaic terms ; the same with Egyptian terms, knowing that one can embellish the whole thing with different weighting system (like Lilly or not using weights like Montanus) [cf. Temperament: Astrology's Forgotten Key, p. 79, Dorian Gieseler Greenbaum 2005]

The Lilly (Ptolemaïc) almuten is VE

In our experience, it seems that Ptolemy's almuten allows one to first appreciate the static side of the natal chart and that the Lilly-type elaboration allows one to deepen the more ‘temporary’ or ‘dynamic ‘ relationships (cf, Shlomo Sela, Ibn Ezra, on Nativities and Continuous Horoscopy, appendix 6, quot 2  ; Horary astrology p, 458, Brill, 2014)
---------------------------------------
Ω  234,94 /
---------------------------------------
the lot of Fortune has been computed according to Makransky's method (see 'Primary directions', A primer of calculation by Bob Makransky, 1988, cap X: the Arabian parts, pp. 98-103) [Makransky regio : 287,35°]
---------------------------------------

almuten	rank	Trad	power	dignity	rank	Lilly	power	dignity
	1	VE	22	Ru	1	VE	14	Ru
	2	JU	21	Ru	3	MO	11	E
	3	MO	15	E	2	JU	10	Ru
	4	SA	15	T	4	SA	6	T
	5	ME	12	T	5	ME	5	T
	6	SU	3	P	7	MA	-5	P
	7	MA	1	P	6	SU	-6	P

---------------------------------------
What we are going to write seems peculiar: it is the hypothesis that echo counter-parallels constitute cyclic factors. Indeed, when two planets are located on either side of the ASC, depending on the proportion of their distance from the ASC, a sort of dynamic rapt-parallel can result when a primary direction run out. In a certain number of cases, these primary directions between counter-parallels will run out within the same period of time; in other cases (result of the arrangement of the planets in houses and of the birth latitude) the 'deadlines' will be different: this is where the notion of cycle takes on its interest as we will now see.

A. Charles and Lady Diana

We see now the primary directions of # SA - MO and # MO - SA

1)- # MO - SA REGIOMONTANUS

 

speculum	Lat	Dec	AR	MD	SA	HA
SA	1,44 N	10,92 N	157,63	34,58 N	75,96 N	41,38 E
(m) #MO	-0,42 S	-0,5 S	180,10	12,11 N	90,63 N	78,52 E

 – MD = meridian distance (from MC if SA f [SA]  is diurnal or IC if Sa f  is nocturnal)
– SA = semi-arc (if f is diurnal, SA f [SA] is D and all MD’s and SA’s are D, otherwise N
– HA = horizontal distance (from the nearest horizon W or E for f [SA] and m (m) #MO)
under bracket [] the fixed point, (here SA)

We see the # MO at 179° making a conjunction with the directed SA at 180.26° REGIO.this arc ends in 1981 and coincides with the marriage of Prince Charles to Lady Diana Spencer.

			23,448
DIRECTIO CONVERSA	h	-20,80	p eclip (41,73)	-37,99
	64,69		65,18		50,99
♄ ☌ ∦☽		DP REGIO-CAMPA C		DP REGIO-CAMPA D
	A1 SA	A1 SA	A2 (m) #MO	A2 (m) #MO	A1 SA
A2 (m) #MO		13,19		-0,51
tan dec/cos dm		64,69		50,99
+LG-A or -LG+A		-32,50		71,18
cot DM.cos B/cos A		-41,30		-14,62
Cos C.sin LG	DAP	-9,76	0,44	0,13	-2,88
Tan pole A1.Tan Dec A2 Tan pole A2. Tan Dec A1		147,87	180,54	180,23	154,75
AR ± DA			-32,67		25,48
AO1 – AO2			CONVERS		DIRECT

-------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) B must be < ε + pε (pole of ecliptic)
(2) sign of pole has the same sens of LG for DA Here, DA = DA/pole A
(3) [+] sign if pole A and Dec have the  same sign; sign [-] if pole and Dec have the opposite sign
(4) to find AO of a star A2 under the pole of A1, we calculate the  DA of A2 under the pole A1 ex: tan pôleA1.tan DecA2=sin DA A2/poleA1

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a true converse direction; Y = -32.67.

2)- # SA - MO REGIOMONTANUS

Charles and Diana divorced on 28 August 1996, after being advised by the Queen in December 1995 to end the marriage.

Here we observe the "mirror" image of the previous figure, ie a conjunction of the counter-parallel of SA entering into conjunction with the moon, for the year 1996.

speculum	Lat	Dec	AR	MD	SA	HA
MO	-0,42 S	11,24 N	28,47	16,26 D	104,47 D	88,21 E
(m) #SA	1,44 N	24,46 N	78,34	66,13 D	124,88 D	58,75 E

– MD = meridian distance (from MC if SA f [MO]  is diurnal or IC if Sa f  is nocturnal)
– SA = semi-arc (if f is diurnal, SA f [MO] is D and all MD’s and SA’s are D, otherwise N
– HA = horizontal distance (from the nearest horizon W or E for f [MO] and m (m) #SA)
under bracket [] the fixed point, (here MO)

			23,448
DIRECTIO CONVERSA	h	47,62	p eclip (41,73)	33,60
	63,2		65,18		3,16
☽ ☌ ∦♄		DP REGIO-CAMPA C		DP REGIO-CAMPA D
	A1 MO	A1 MO	A2 (m) #SA	A2 (m) #SA	A1 MO
A2 (m) #SA		11,70		48,34
tan dec/cos dm		39,80		3,16
+LG-A or -LG+A		69,61		-33,62
cot DM.cos B/cos A		15,82		40,67
Cos C.sin LG	DAP	3,23	7,41	23,01	9,83
Tan pole A1.Tan Dec A2 Tan pole A2. Tan Dec A1		25,24	70,93	55,33	18,64
AR ± DA			-45,69		36,69
AO1 – AO2			CONVERS		DIRECT

-------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) B must be < ε+pε (pole of ecliptic)
(2) sign of pole has the same sens of LG for DA Here, DA = DA/pole A
(3) [+] sign if pole A and Dec have the  same sign; sign [-] if pole and Dec have the opposite sign
(4) to find AO of a star A2 under the pole of A1, we calculate the  DA of A2 under the pole A1 ex: tan pôleA1.tan DecA2=sin DA A2/poleA1

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a true converse direction; Y = 45.69.

We see that at the same time (± 2°) MO is opposite to MA : this direction coincides with Lady Diana's fatal accident (08/31/1997): there is therefore opposition between #SA and MA.

speculum	Lat	Dec	AR	MD	SA	HA
MA	-0,93 S	-24,07 S	260,09	67,88 N	124,16 N	56,28 W
ꝏMO	0,42 N	-11,24 S	208,47	16,26 N	104,47 N	88,21 W

– MD = meridian distance (from MC if SA f [MA]  is diurnal or IC if Sa f  is nocturnal)
– SA = semi-arc (if f is diurnal, SA f [MA] is D and all MD’s and SA’s are D, otherwise N
– HA = horizontal distance (from the nearest horizon W or E for f [MA] and m ꝏMO)
under bracket [] the fixed point, (here MA)

-------------------------------------------------------------------

				23,448
	DIRECTIO RECTA	h	-32,22	p eclip (41,73)	-47,62
		1,62		65,18		39,80
			DP REGIO-CAMPA C		DP REGIO-CAMPA D
DP REGIOMONTANUS		A1 MA	A1 MA	A2 ꝏMO	A2 ꝏMO	A1 MA
	A2 ꝏMO		-49,88		-11,70
Tan A	tan dec/cos dm		1,62		39,80
B (1)	+LG-A or -LG+A		-32,23		69,60
Tan C	cot DM.cos B/cos A		-41,45		-15,83
Sin pole (2)	Cos C.sin LG	DAP	23,24	10,11	3,23	7,28
Sin DA (3)	Tan pole A1.Tan Dec A2 Tan pole A2. Tan Dec A1		236,86	198,36	205,24	252,82
AO (4)	AR ± DA			38,49		47,58
arc	AO1 – AO2			CONVERS		DIRECT

-------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) B must be treated as positive number
(2) sign of pole has the same sens of LG for DA Here, DA = DA/pole A
(3) sign [-] if pole and Dec have the opposite sign – sign [+] if planet located in western half, sign [-] if planet located in eastern half ; Signs [+] and [-] must be reversed for births in the southern hemisphere
(4) to find AO of a star A2 under the pole of A1, we calculate the  DA of A2 under the pole A1 ex: tan pôleA1.tan DecA2=sin DA A2/poleA1
(5) algorithm from Gouchon ('Dictionnaire astrologique', Dervy, 1946, 1975, p, 276, attributed to H. Selva) ; Martin Gansten ('Primary directions', pp155-157, 2009, Wessex Astrologer) - instructions for use only appear in Gansten
-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a direct direction : Y = 47.58.