BARTHOU Louis
25 Aug 1862 GREG CAL
monday GREG
| lat 43° 12' 0" | N 0°36' W
0
---------------------------------
natal (bt) 13 h 30 min
raas-rams :23h 57' 55"
reckoned bt Lat --> lmt 1 h 0 min
tu 1h 0' 7"
tsn 23h 12' 9"
---------------------------------
timezone : 0
DST : 0 (-)
Equation of time -0h 2' 4"
ΔT 0h 0' 8"
---------------------------------
French politician, a foreign minister and lawyer, he served as Prime Minister of the Third Republic in 1913.
He was assassinated along with King Alexander of Yugoslavia on 9 October 1934 in Marseille, France. The political assassination was accomplished by a Macedonian terrorist working with Croat revolutionists.
A ballistic report on the bullets found in the car was made in 1935, but its results were not made available to the public until 1974. The report revealed that Barthou had been hit by an 8 mm Modèle 1892 revolver round, commonly used in weapons carried by French police. Thus Barthou was killed during the frantic police response, rather than by the assassin. This was not, however, the only threat that had hung over Barthou that year: due to a "heart threat", he had had to hand over the interim at the Quai d'Orsay for two months to François Pietri [cf. Souvenir de Barthou, revue des Deux Mondes, François Pietri, 1er mars 1961, pp 65-75]. His injury, to the humeral artery, was not fatal but had caused a severe haemorrhage that had justified sedation (by chloroform) and a transfusion. It was in these circumstances that Louis Barthou succumbed in this state of unconsciousness. It is possible that he had a heart attack following the stress induced by the double trauma.
We will try to see if such observations, which are ultimately bad luck, can be included in his horoscope.
Source :
astro-com : https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Barthou,_Louis
Gauquelin NS Vol 3/0070 (bc n°142)
If we consider the MUNDANE system, we observe a sextil aspect of MO.
At the same time, it appears that MO has dignity of RUL over POF.
So we have two possibilities with our hypothesis : first choose POF for hyleg ; second choose the MUNDANE system and try to find another couple of hyleg/alchocoden,
If we choose now POF we must know that no trad authority agree with this choice
In case of POF is the Hyleg, there is then two candidates to be alchocoden: and
First, we have to see which candidate has the most dignity: here, MA has candidate alcho dignities referring to POF : [RUL]
First, MO is linked with POF by a [sextil] aspect and a [RUL] dignity,
However, MO is [T cb] and has a power of [-1], and so MO has a bad Kadkhudah score of [6]
MO is located at 147,16° at more than 5° from [Δ degrees cups sup [III] : 6,69° (60)] and has a domitude Regio of : [66,69] for a latitude of [-4,55°]
THEME
SU is Fa with a [6] score - house rgo 3
MO is T cb with a [3] score - house rgo 3
ME is te - T - Fa with a [19] score - house rgo 3
VE is P with a [-10] score - house rgo 2
JU is D with a [-4] score - house rgo 10
MA is Ru with a [-7] score - house rgo 4
SA is P with a [-9] score - house rgo 4
points to specially watch for the social destiny: MA in house X
we see below the list of aspects :
---------------------------------------
VE[-2,43 Occ ]MA
---------------------------------------
The traditional almuten (Omar, Ibn Ezra) is ME
we see below the list of dignities for ME :
---------------------------------------
[ term 2 tri 0 rul 1 exn 1 fac 2 ]
[ su 4 mo 0 asc 0 syg 0 pof 0 ]
---------------------------------------
Note 1 : the ‘almuten figuris’ is the lord of the chart, but its determination obeys somewhat different rules according to the schools. The tradition is based above all on the zodiacal dignities. (see p,e, Alcabitius, Introduction, 59-61, 117 and Avenezra, Nativites, 101) – almuten = al-mu’tazz (arabic term)
[7] As for the governor which is the <planet> predominating (al-mubtazz) over the birth from which one indicates the conditions of the native after the haylāğ and the kadhudāh,n it is the planet having the most leadership in the ascendant, the position<s> of the two luminaries, the position of the Lot of Fortune and the position of the degree of the conjunction or opposition which precedes the birth. When a planet has mastery over two, three or four positions by the abundance of its shares in them, it is the governor and the predominant <planet> (al-mubtazz) and the indicator after the haylāğ and the kadhudāh. From it one indicates the conditions of the native. Some people use it instead of the kadhudāh in giving life. [Al-Qabisi , Charles Burnett, Keji Yamamoto, Michio Yano, The Introduction to Astrology, IV, 7, p, 117, Warburg, 2004]
Note 2 : There are at least 4 systems for determining the almuten depending on whether the combinations of triplicities and terms are used: the Ptolemaic almuten (followed by Lilly) with Ptolemaic terms ; the same with Egyptian terms; the almuten of Dorotheus with Ptolemaic terms ; the same with Egyptian terms, knowing that one can embellish the whole thing with different weighting system (like Lilly or not using weights like Montanus) [cf. Temperament: Astrology's Forgotten Key, p. 79, Dorian Gieseler Greenbaum 2005]
The Lilly (Ptolemaïc) almuten is JU
In our experience, it seems that Ptolemy's almuten allows one to first appreciate the static side of the natal chart and that the Lilly-type elaboration allows one to deepen the more ‘temporary’ or ‘dynamic ‘ relationships (cf, Shlomo Sela, Ibn Ezra, on Nativities and Continuous Horoscopy, appendix 6, quot 2 ; Horary astrology p, 458, Brill, 2014)
---------------------------------------
Ω 64,41 /
---------------------------------------
the lot of Fortune has been computed according to Makransky's method (see 'Primary directions', A primer of calculation by Bob Makransky, 1988, cap X: the Arabian parts, pp. 98-103) [Makransky regio : 103,19°]
About the lot of fortune
As we know, the Lot of Fortune is a fictitious point that has been called the lunar ascendant. It is therefore not a one-off formation like the other stars. I refer first to an article reviewing the contribution of Hellenistic astrology [Dorian Gieseler Greenbaum, ‘Calculating the Lots of Fortune and Daemon in Hellenistic Astrology’, Culture And Cosmos, Vol. 11 no. 2, Autumn/Winter 2007 pp. 163-187. www.CultureAndCosmos.].
'First is the Lot of Fortune which, for those born by day, it will be necessary to count from the
solar degree to the lunar degree, and one must cast out the collected number from the degree-
number of the ascendant, giving 30 degrees to each sign. And where the collected number
leaves off, say that at that place is the Lot of Fortune. For those at night, the reverse, that is
from the lunar degree to the solar. And likewise one must cast out the remainder from the
degree of the ascendant.' [Paul of Alexandria, Introduction, Ch. 23, trans. Greenbaum, Late Classical Astrology, pgs. 41-42]
There is a very interesting article in Wilson’s dictionary [A complete dictionary of astrology, London, 1819, pp. 306-312] where the difficulty of reconciling in mundo (ASC) and zodiacal (SU) positions is clearly highlighted... while knowing that the Moon has both, by its overall trajectory, its latitude... The figure of Placidus is evoked at the same time as that of Negusantius (we recall that Placidus did not really know what to do with the POF until Negusantius developed a method which finally convinced Placidus of the interest of taking the POF into consideration, cf. Primum mobile, Canon of the Part of Fortune). According to Placidus, in fact, the problem that arose until then, in the conception of the POF, related to its calculation on the ecliptic while according to him, this calculation should relate to the conformity of the parallel of MO (and even of the lunar latitude on which the POF should be directed).
The question was taken up by Marco Fumagalli (Cielo et terra site) who wrote a magnificent synthesis on the work of Placidus and Negusantius, defining the very subtle notion of hourly part and using what he calls the 'grado di passaggio' which allows a longitude to be attributed to the POF. [cf. 'Il calcolo delle sorti secondo Placido', Linguaggio Astrale 103, June 1996 and 'La sorte oraria, il vero oroscopo lunare.' (Phôs 2, giugno 2001)]
Thus, to find the position of the part, Negusanzio calculates in oblique ascension the distance between the Sun and the horoscope, and adds to it the right ascension of the Moon. He thus obtains the right ascension of the part, which will always be on the same parallel of declination as the Moon. However, the Negusanzio method finds its limit in the fact that Ptolemy's principle is only valid at sunrise: it is the true - but ephemeral - lunar horoscope.
Fumagalli writes :
'A few years after Placidus' death, when the Coelestis Philosophia of 1675 was reprinted, Francesco Brunacci and Francesco Maria Onorati became aware of the inappropriateness of the Placidian method and proposed a new one. This is the hourly method. Brunacci and Onorati do not speak expressly of hours but of equatorial distances, which we know is the same thing. The calculation retains the same structure but is done entirely on the equator using the oblique ascension of the horoscope and the mixed ascensions (AM) of the luminaries, that is, the AOCH in the ascending hemisphere and the DOCH in the descending hemisphere.' [in 'La sorte oraria, il vero oroscopo lunare.']
It is not easy to find information on the AM (mixed ascensions) mentioned by Fumagalli. Fortunately, there is a booklet that takes stock of these AM in 'Il calcolo delle coordinate dei Cardini e degli Astri di nascita' and which also takes up some of Fumagalli's work.
Ascensione (AOCH) o Discensione Obliqua nel Circolo Orario (DOCH) :
If the star is located to the east of the meridian, we will calculate its
AOCH with the following formulas:
1) for a star above the horizon (i.e. in the 1st quadrant):
AOCH = ARMC + (15 x DH)
2) for a star below the horizon (i.e. in the 4th quadrant):
AOCH = ARIC - (15 x DH)
If the star is located to the west of the meridian, we will calculate its
DOCH with the following formulas:
1) for a star above the horizon (i.e. in the 2nd quadrant):
DOCH = ARMC - (15 x DH)
2) for a star below the horizon (i.e. 3rd quadrant):
DOCH = ARIC + (15 x DH)
It is also difficult to find references on the 'grado il passaggio' and in particular on the double sign which must clearly be used in the formula:
tang theta = sin AOCH /(cos AOCH cos eps ± sin eps tang CH)
where :
- AOCH (or DOCH) is the oblique ascension or descension on part pole (CH)
- eps : ecliptic
- 𝜗 (theta : ecliptic degree of transit
)
- ± : if point is oriental, take [-], else [+]
In the horoscope of Louis Barthou, we find :
| FORTUNA | |
| ao asc | 78,04 |
| am fortuna | 83,81 |
| dh fortuna | 5,62 |
| ch | 41,32 |
| doch fortuna | 83,81 |
| ϑ | 104,17 |
So, POF = 104° 10' 26" ♋
- am ⊕ = ao asc + am ☉ (151.66) - am ☽ (145.88)
- dh ⊕ = (RAIC - am ⊕)/15
- ch ⊕ => TAN P = SIN (1/6 DA. DH) . COT DEC. where DA ☽ = 7.77°, DH ☽ = 5.62°
and DEC ☽ = + 8.19°
- doch ⊕ = RAIC - 15*dh ⊕
- TAN(ϑ) = SIN(83.81)/(COS(83.81)*COS(eclip)-SIN(eclip)*TAN(41.32))
Primary directions
1)- 1934
It has been said that the Part of Fortune being a zodiacal place, it can receive aspects from the planets but not give them... In fact it must be treated like the ASC from this point of view. And this is how we find in Barthou's theme the following direction for date of 'accident' : 9 OCTOBER 1934.
direction directa : ☌♂ ☌⊕
| speculum | Lat | Dec | AR | MD | SA | HA |
| MA | -4,69 S | 3 N | 19,06 | 148,98 N | 87,18 N | -61,8 W |
| CPOF | -4,55 S | 18,27 N | 103,86 | 64,18 N | 71,93 N | 7,75 W |
– MD = meridian distance (from MC if SA f [MA] is diurnal or IC if Sa f is nocturnal)
– SA = semi-arc (if f is diurnal, SA f [MA] is D and all MD’s and SA’s are D, otherwise N
– HA = horizontal distance (from the nearest horizon W or E for f [MA] and m CPOF)
under bracket [] the fixed point, (here MA)
- Lat CPOF -4,55 S and lat MA : -4.69 S
| DP REGIOMONTANUS (5) | DP REGIO-CAMPA D | DP REGIO-CAMPA C | ||||
| DIRECTIO RECTA | A2 CMA | A1 POF | A1 POF | A2 CMA | A2 CMA | A1 POF |
| Tan A | tan dec/cos dm | 38,15 | 3,50 | |||
| B (1) | +LG-A or -LG+A | -81,35 | 39,70 | |||
| Tan C | cot DM.cos B/cos A | -5,09 | 52,04 | |||
| Sin pole (2) | Cos C.sin LG | 42,99 | 24,90 | |||
| Sin DA (3) | Tan pole A1.Tan Dec A2 Tan pole A2. Tan Dec A1 |
DAP (6) | 18,01 | 2,80 | 1,39 | 8,86 |
| AO (4) | AR ± DA | 85,01 | 16,26 | 17,67 | 94,16 | |
| arc | AO1 – AO2 | 68,75 | 76,49 | |||
| DIRECT | CONVERS |
(1) B must be treated as positive number
(2) sign of pole has the same sens of LG for DA Here, DA = DA/pole A
(3) sign [-] if pole and Dec have the opposite sign – sign [+] if planet located in western half, sign [-] if planet located in eastern half ; Signs [+] and [-] must be reversed for births in the southern hemisphere
(4) to find AO of a star A2 under the pole of A1, we calculate the DA of A2 under the pole A1 ex: tan pôleA1.tan DecA2=sin DA A2/poleA1
(5) algorithm from : a)- Gouchon (‘Dictionnaire astrologique’, Dervy, 1946, 1975, p, 276, attributed to H. Selva) ; b)- Martin Gansten (‘Primary directions’, pp, 155-157, 2009, Wessex Astrologer) - instructions for use only appear in Gansten – c)- Astrologia gallica, Morin de Villefranche, trad Holden (appendix 5, pp, 151-153)
(6) ascensional difference under own pole
| ARC CONVERS |
| Y 76,49 Δ = -1,8 |
| BRAHE : 0° 57' 56" |
| key convert 1,036 |
We see that ϑ = 104.17°. By direct movement, MO will travel in 4h56 (time corresponding to 72.12 Y, or 5h56min of UT) 2.63°, which will bring its longitude 𝞴 to 149°47' and the degree of passage of the POF ϑ to 101.31°.
We then find:
Direction MA -POF = 102.56° - 101.85° =0.71°
So, at the time of Louis Barthou's accident, we find a potentially problematic direction between MA and POF. Knowing that MA is in X, ruler, with conjunction to 𝛃 Persei (dom regio ♂ 298 and dom regio Algol 301.82), retrograde and with a negative celestial value of [-7]. POF is hyleg, in I and the alchocoden is MO. MO is cb.
2) 1913 : first minister
directio directa : ⚹♀ ☌☉
| speculum | Lat | Dec | AR | MD | SA | HA |
| SU | - | 10,93 N | 153,56 | 14,48 N | 79,55 N | 65,07 W |
| *MO | -4,55 S | 17,8 N | 108,32 | 59,72 N | 72,45 N | 12,73 W |
– MD = meridian distance (from MC if SA f [SU] is diurnal or IC if Sa f is nocturnal)
– SA = semi-arc (if f is diurnal, SA f [SU] is D and all MD’s and SA’s are D, otherwise N
– HA = horizontal distance (from the nearest horizon W or E for f [SU] and m *MO)
under bracket [] the fixed point, (here SU)
- Lat *MO -4,55 S and lat MO : -4° 32' 57"
| DP REGIOMONTANUS (5) | DP REGIO-CAMPA C | DP REGIO-CAMPA D | ||||
| DIRECTIO RECTA | A2 *MO | A1 SU | A1 SU | A2 *MO | A2 *MO | A1 SU |
| Tan A | tan dec/cos dm | 11,29 | 32,49 | |||
| B (1) | +LG-A or -LG+A | -54,49 | 75,69 | |||
| Tan C | cot DM.cos B/cos A | -66,45 | 9,71 | |||
| Sin pole (2) | Cos C.sin LG | 15,87 | 42,43 | |||
| Sin DA (3) | Tan pole A1.Tan Dec A2 Tan pole A2. Tan Dec A1 |
DAP (6) | 3,15 | 5,24 | 17,07 | 10,18 |
| AO (4) | AR ± DA | 150,41 | 103,08 | 91,25 | 143,38 | |
| arc | AO1 – AO2 | 47,33 | 52,13 | |||
| CONVERS | DIRECT |
(1) B must be treated as positive number
(2) sign of pole has the same sens of LG for DA Here, DA = DA/pole A
(3) sign [-] if pole and Dec have the opposite sign – sign [+] if planet located in western half, sign [-] if planet located in eastern half ; Signs [+] and [-] must be reversed for births in the southern hemisphere
(4) to find AO of a star A2 under the pole of A1, we calculate the DA of A2 under the pole A1 ex: tan pôleA1.tan DecA2=sin DA A2/poleA1
(5) algorithm from : a)- Gouchon (‘Dictionnaire astrologique’, Dervy, 1946, 1975, p, 276, attributed to H. Selva) ; b)- Martin Gansten (‘Primary directions’, pp, 155-157, 2009, Wessex Astrologer) - instructions for use only appear in Gansten – c)- Astrologia gallica, Morin de Villefranche, trad Holden (appendix 5, pp, 151-153)
(6) ascensional difference under own pole
| ARC DIRECT |
| Y 52,14 Δ = 0,24 |
| BRAHE : 0° 57' 56" |
| key convert 1,036 |
The arc is said to be direct; however, never forget that the graphic representation is misleading. If you recalculate the horoscope for 4h 27' UT (i.e. 1h natal + 3h27) corresponding to 50.57 Y, you will immediately understand that the induced movement is solely attributable to the primum mobile.
