LINCOLN Abraham
American lawyer, politician and U.S. President. As one of the most
respected figures in history and most famous leaders of the United
States, he held office from 1861-1865. Lincoln was a member of the
Legislature from 1834-1841, a U.S. Representative from 1847-1849 and the
issuer of the Emancipation Proclamation on 1 January 1863. He was
assassinated on 14 April 1865 in Washington, DC.
I)- natal chart
On the birth of Lincoln, see :
http://rogerjnorton.com/Lincoln88.html. It seems that birth occurs at sunup. Formerly, "Horoscopes of U.S. Presidents" gave 2:10 AM [
Astrodients]. If we take 7h, we find the following chart :
with a strong SA, near MC (cadent), MA VIII. The ALMUDEBIT is JU, following by SA. We have a lot of detrimental planets, except SA and JU. Notably detrimental are ME (PISCES) with quadrature to SA, MO (CAPRI) with quadrature to MA, SU (AQUARIUS).
- ASC AQUARIUS, ruler SA
- MC SAGIT, ruler JU
- ME I, with JU and VE
- MA VIII
- HYLEG ME
- ANAERETA SA, MA
- ALCOCODEN JU
- ALMUTEN SA
II)- primary directions
A)- 1860 Presidential nomination
1)-
// MO conj SA
direction |
promissor |
significator |
// MO conj. SA |
// MO |
conj. SA |
long |
180,45 N W |
243,14 N W |
lat |
-4,966 |
-2,008 |
AR |
178,426 |
240,681 |
dec |
-4,732 |
-22,775 |
ha |
1,199 |
0,113 |
OA |
174,776 |
221,841 |
dom Campa |
194,283 |
258,043 |
dom Regio |
197,805 |
260,471 |
Dom Placidus |
198,376 |
261,824 |
pôle Regio |
36,217 |
7,257 |
pôle Campa |
36,217 |
7,257 |
Pôle Placidus |
31,478 |
4,069 |
DM D|N |
D |68,719 - N |111,281 |
D |6,464 - N |173,54 |
DA pôle D|N |
D |2,905 - N |4,338 |
D |1,712 - N |30,04 |
DA |
3,65 |
18,841 |
SA D|N |
D |86,35 N |93,65 |
D |71,16 N |108,84 |
D Horiz |
17,63 |
77,62 |
Htd* |
15,608 |
18,14 |
DH** |
-4,403 |
-0,356 |
TS |
247,146 |
16:28:35 |
lat geo, |
37,567 |
|
eclip |
23,462 |
|
birth year |
1809 |
|
event year |
1860 |
|
* temporal hour (= 1/6e Sad) |
** horary distance, (= mundane positions, see Giuseppe Bezza) |
|
- analysis
- result
RESULT |
promissor |
significator |
|
// MO |
conj. SA |
long radix |
180,45 N W |
243,14 N W |
latitude |
-4,966 |
-2,008 |
proper motion MO |
-1,95 corr, for // |
|
|
|
|
direction |
// MO conj. SA |
|
key factor |
key : AR =0,98 |
used key factor |
result ± 0,5 year |
M C Placidus 1/Ar orb 0,07 |
50,23 |
year (for key) |
|
1 859,23 |
long D conversed (-) |
// MO |
conj. SA |
Regio-campa |
105,41 S W |
188,71 N W |
placidus |
106,21 S W |
187,34 N W |
long D progressed (+) |
|
|
Regio-campa |
243,41 N W |
289,22 N E |
placidus |
241,04 |
289,26 |
Conversed direction |
|
|
arc regio-campa |
-137,73 |
-8,26 |
arc placidus |
-136,93 |
-6,89 |
Progressed direction |
|
|
arc regio-campa |
0,27 |
-108,77 |
arc placidus |
-2,096 |
-108,813 |
weight factor |
W |
n ray |
Zodiacal |
0,00 |
0 |
Mundane |
1,93 |
2 |
X1 (fictitious) |
0,00 |
0 |
X2 (fictitious) |
0,00 |
0 |
M C Placidus 1/Ar orb 0,07. For used key factor.
- variation with another key factor
direction |
// MO conj. SA |
|
key factor |
key : AR =0,98 |
1/Ar |
result ± 0,5 year |
M C Placidus 1/Ar orb 0,07 |
51,78 |
year (for key) |
|
1 860,78 |
long D conversed (-) |
// MO |
conj. SA |
Regio-campa |
103,84 S W |
186,88 N W |
placidus |
104,78 S W |
185,55 N W |
long D progressed (+) |
|
|
Regio-campa |
245,15 N W |
290,64 N E |
placidus |
242,76 |
290,70 |
Conversed direction |
|
|
arc regio-campa |
-139,3 |
-6,43 |
arc placidus |
-138,36 |
-5,10 |
Progressed direction |
|
|
arc regio-campa |
2,01 |
-110,19 |
arc placidus |
-0,379 |
-110,250 |
Here, we have a
placidus ray of -0.4 with 1/AR factor. It is very interesting to use this pitch in order to understand what append.
2)-
#JU conj VE
direction |
promissor |
significator |
// JU conj. VE |
// JU |
conj. VE |
long |
300,49 N E |
7,47 S E |
lat |
0,000 |
0,000 |
AR |
302,694 |
6,855 |
dec |
-20,065 |
2,965 |
ha |
-0,969 |
4,194 |
OA |
286,377 |
4,571 |
dom Campa |
344,691 |
22,583 |
dom Regio |
340,948 |
27,687 |
Dom Placidus |
337,849 |
28,139 |
pôle Regio |
36,019 |
34,259 |
pôle Campa |
36,019 |
34,259 |
Pôle Placidus |
30,254 |
27,868 |
DM D|N |
D |55,548 - N |124,452 |
D |119,709 - N |60,29 |
DA pôle D|N |
D |12,301 - N |19,1 |
D |2,962 - N |1,57 |
DA |
16,317 |
2,284 |
SA D|N |
D |73,68 N |106,32 |
D |92,28 N |87,72 |
D Horiz |
18,14 |
27,43 |
Htd* |
17,719 |
15,381 |
DH** |
-3,135 |
3,920 |
TS |
247,146 |
16:28:35 |
lat geo, |
37,567 |
|
eclip |
23,462 |
|
birth year |
1809 |
|
event year |
1860 |
|
* temporal hour (= 1/6e Sad) |
** horary distance, (= mundane positions, see Giuseppe Bezza) |
|
- analysis
weight factor |
W |
n ray |
Zodiacal |
3,35 |
5 |
Mundane |
7,47 |
3 |
X1 (fictitious) |
-0,63 |
2 |
X2 (fictitious) |
-0,64 |
2 |
In this case, we have a X1 fictitious ray more precise than Z or M, but the weight is much more present with Z or M.
- result
RESULT |
promissor |
significator |
|
// JU |
conj. VE |
long radix |
300,49 N E |
7,47 S E |
latitude |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
direction |
// JU conj. VE |
|
key factor |
key : 1/Ar =1,02 |
used key factor |
result ± 0,5 year |
X-2 Gold Placid 'AR' orb -0,06 |
51,78 |
year (for key) |
|
1 860,78 |
Lg D CONVERSED (-) |
// JU |
conj. VE |
Regio-campa |
250,74 N E |
295,56 N E |
placidus |
251,08 N E |
300,22 N E |
Lg D PROGRESSED (+) |
|
|
Regio-campa |
15,6 S E |
74,37 S W |
placidus |
9,74 |
71,05 |
CONVERSE diff |
|
|
arc regio-campa |
243,27 |
4,93 |
arc placidus |
243,61 |
0,27 |
PROGRESSED diff |
|
|
arc regio-campa |
8,13 |
226,12 |
arc placidus |
2,266 |
229,443 |
We have also the primary direction :
M D Placidus 1/EQU orb 0.15. See what occurs with the key factor 1/EQU :
RESULT |
promissor |
significator |
|
// JU |
conj. VE |
long radix |
300,49 N E |
7,47 S E |
latitude |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
direction |
// JU conj. VE |
|
key factor |
key : 1/Ar =1,02 |
1/Equ |
result ± 0,5 year |
X-2 Gold Placid 'AR' orb -0,06 |
50,48 |
year (for key) |
|
1 859,48 |
Lg D CONVERSED (-) |
// JU |
conj. VE |
Regio-campa |
251,83 N E |
296,97 N E |
placidus |
252,2 N E |
301,64 N E |
Lg D PROGRESSED (+) |
|
|
Regio-campa |
13,57 S E |
73,03 S W |
placidus |
7,86 |
69,72 |
CONVERSE diff |
|
|
arc regio-campa |
244,36 |
3,52 |
arc placidus |
244,73 |
-1,15 |
PROGRESSED diff |
|
|
arc regio-campa |
6,10 |
227,46 |
arc placidus |
0,386 |
230,774 |
.
We find a direct placidus ray.
D = 7.86-7.47 = 0.386°.
We can also make the computation of the mundane arcs :
We see a
M D Placidus : D diff = 339.085° (//JU) - 338.78° (VE) = -0.3° of domitude (cum latitudine).
There is the same direction
without latitude :
We have the same ray (
M D Placidus) with orb 0.15 (see the analysis table).
B)- reelection 1864
1)-
// ME conj MA
direction |
promissor |
significator |
// ME conj. MA |
// ME |
conj. MA |
long |
130,16 S W |
205,64 N W |
lat |
0,001 |
2,643 |
AR |
132,614 |
204,738 |
dec |
17,715 |
-7,459 |
ha |
1,999 |
0,740 |
OA |
118,391 |
198,958 |
dom Campa |
171,598 |
216,850 |
dom Regio |
169,445 |
223,395 |
Dom Placidus |
167,756 |
224,681 |
pôle Regio |
37,095 |
29,201 |
pôle Campa |
37,095 |
29,201 |
Pôle Placidus |
33,674 |
21,196 |
DM D|N |
D |114,532 - N |65,468 |
D |42,408 - N |137,59 |
DA pôle D|N |
D |15,63 - N |12,288 |
D |2,91 - N |8,303 |
DA |
14,223 |
5,78 |
SA D|N |
D |104,22 N |75,78 |
D |84,22 N |95,78 |
D Horiz |
141,24 |
126,63 |
Htd* |
12,63 |
15,963 |
DH** |
-5,184 |
2,657 |
TS |
247,146 |
16:28:35 |
lat geo, |
37,567 |
|
eclip |
23,462 |
|
birth year |
1809 |
|
event year |
1864 |
|
* temporal hour (= 1/6e Sad) |
** horary distance, (= mundane positions, see Giuseppe Bezza) |
|
- analysis
- result
Note that the event correspond to
1864.6, because Lincoln is re-elected in november 1864.
Observe the progressed arc
//ME conj MA at
205.64° LIBRA. We have also a mundane result :
Observe the conversed arc
MA conj // ME (Campanus domitude 172.038°) corresponding to a L(z) of
130.84° LEO.
2)-
// MA conj JU
direction |
promissor |
significator |
// MA conj. JU |
// MA |
conj. JU |
long |
279,14 N E |
352,09 S E |
lat |
0,000 |
0,000 |
AR |
279,952 |
352,733 |
dec |
-23,146 |
-3,142 |
ha |
-0,573 |
-1,843 |
OA |
260,756 |
350,313 |
dom Campa |
323,182 |
14,352 |
dom Regio |
316,638 |
17,891 |
Dom Placidus |
311,702 |
17,536 |
pôle Regio |
29,214 |
36,204 |
pôle Campa |
29,214 |
36,204 |
Pôle Placidus |
19,885 |
31,773 |
DM D|N |
D |32,807 - N |147,193 |
D |105,588 - N |74,41 |
DA pôle D|N |
D |8,895 - N |25,877 |
D |2,918 - N |1,949 |
DA |
19,197 |
2,42 |
SA D|N |
D |70,8 N |109,2 |
D |87,58 N |92,42 |
D Horiz |
38,00 |
18,01 |
Htd* |
11,801 |
14,597 |
DH** |
2,780 |
-5,098 |
TS |
247,146 |
16:28:35 |
lat geo, |
37,567 |
|
eclip |
23,462 |
|
birth year |
1809 |
|
event year |
1864,6 |
|
* temporal hour (= 1/6e Sad) |
** horary distance, (= mundane positions, see Giuseppe Bezza) |
|
- analysis
- result
D -->
Z D Regio-Campa AR orb -0.39. The difference of orb is due by fact of
difference of time in the diagram table analysis, and the
difference of AR in result table.
C)- Assassination 1865
1)-
MO conj SA
It is a major ray ; SA is ruler of MC and MO is detrimental because of a radix quadrature of MA. Furthermore, MO is in exile (CAPRI).
direction |
promissor |
significator |
C SA conj. MO |
C SA |
conj. MO |
long |
243,14 N W |
299,2 N E |
lat |
2,008 |
4,966 |
AR |
241,508 |
300,282 |
dec |
-18,835 |
-15,477 |
ha |
0,098 |
-0,927 |
OA |
226,298 |
287,985 |
dom Campa |
260,401 |
339,025 |
dom Regio |
262,365 |
334,189 |
Dom Placidus |
263,216 |
331,545 |
pôle Regio |
5,835 |
34,700 |
pôle Campa |
5,835 |
34,700 |
Pôle Placidus |
3,357 |
27,841 |
DM D|N |
D |5,637 - N |174,363 |
D |53,136 - N |126,86 |
DA pôle D|N |
D |1,147 - N |25,208 |
D |8,409 - N |15,25 |
DA |
15,211 |
12,297 |
SA D|N |
D |74,79 N |105,21 |
D |77,7 N |102,3 |
D Horiz |
69,15 |
24,57 |
Htd* |
17,535 |
12,951 |
DH** |
0,321 |
-4,103 |
TS |
247,146 |
16:28:35 |
lat geo, |
37,567 |
|
eclip |
23,462 |
|
birth year |
1809 |
|
event year |
1865 |
|
* temporal hour (= 1/6e Sad) |
** horary distance, (= mundane positions, see Giuseppe Bezza) |
|
- analysis
- result
D -->
M C Placidus AR orb 0.08. So, it is a
true converse direction.
2)-
//MO conj SA
Mirror direction of MO conj SA.
direction |
promissor |
significator |
// MO conj. SA |
// MO |
conj. SA |
long |
185,61 N W |
243,14 N W |
lat |
0,000 |
0,000 |
AR |
185,150 |
241,100 |
dec |
-2,231 |
-20,805 |
ha |
1,082 |
0,106 |
OA |
183,432 |
224,107 |
dom Campa |
201,535 |
259,285 |
dom Regio |
206,467 |
261,470 |
Dom Placidus |
206,798 |
262,547 |
pôle Regio |
34,550 |
6,509 |
pôle Campa |
34,550 |
6,509 |
Pôle Placidus |
28,378 |
3,698 |
DM D|N |
D |61,996 - N |118,004 |
D |6,046 - N |173,95 |
DA pôle D|N |
D |1,206 - N |2,209 |
D |1,407 - N |27,629 |
DA |
1,717 |
16,994 |
SA D|N |
D |88,28 N |91,72 |
D |73,01 N |106,99 |
D Horiz |
26,29 |
79,05 |
Htd* |
15,286 |
12,168 |
DH** |
4,056 |
-0,497 |
TS |
247,146 |
16:28:35 |
lat geo, |
37,567 |
|
eclip |
23,462 |
|
birth year |
1809 |
|
event year |
1865 |
|
* temporal hour (= 1/6e Sad) |
** horary distance, (= mundane positions, see Giuseppe Bezza) |
|
- analysis
We find here AR direction : it is because of the proximity of MC ; we have already noted that there is perhaps a relation between the // ray and the Goldmayer arcs.
- result
The direction is :
SA conj // MO. L(z) =
185.11° LIBRA (domitude Placidus, orb 0.5°).
3)-
ME opp SA
ME is ruler of ASC.
direction |
promissor |
significator |
opp. ME conj. SA |
opp. ME |
conj. SA |
long |
160,31 N W |
243,14 N W |
lat |
0,001 |
2,008 |
AR |
161,827 |
241,508 |
dec |
7,710 |
-18,835 |
ha |
1,489 |
0,098 |
OA |
155,850 |
226,298 |
dom Campa |
188,403 |
260,401 |
dom Regio |
190,557 |
262,365 |
Dom Placidus |
189,995 |
263,216 |
pôle Regio |
37,095 |
5,835 |
pôle Campa |
37,095 |
5,835 |
Pôle Placidus |
34,373 |
3,357 |
DM D|N |
D |85,319 - N |94,681 |
D |5,637 - N |174,36 |
DA pôle D|N |
D |5,313 - N |6,735 |
D |1,147 - N |25,208 |
DA |
5,977 |
15,211 |
SA D|N |
D |95,98 N |84,02 |
D |74,79 N |105,21 |
D Horiz |
10,66 |
80,43 |
Htd* |
14,004 |
12,465 |
DH** |
6,092 |
-0,452 |
TS |
247,146 |
16:28:35 |
lat geo, |
37,567 |
|
eclip |
23,462 |
|
birth year |
1809 |
|
event year |
1865 |
|
* temporal hour (= 1/6e Sad) |
** horary distance, (= mundane positions, see Giuseppe Bezza) |
|
- analysis
- result
We have a
C REgio-Campa ray : L(z) =
243° SAGIT (dom Campa = 259.12°).
conclusion
In this study, we were able to offer the reader new analytical options. It is now possible to highlight in a very precise way the longitudes radix and directed, as well as the domitudes, in direct situation or converse.