FARNESE Alessandro

HIERONYMI CARDANI - DE EXEMPLIS CENTUM GENITURARUM

VI

FARNESE Alessandro (1468-1549)

See Paulus III.

In link with the developments I have recently introduced, I add here two converse direction #MO conj. SA and mirroring #SA conj MO. This direction is mundane; we must first find the zodiacal longitude corresponding to the mundane position of #MO (318 ° domitude Campanus). The computation is then treated as usual.

Recall for this natal chart :

• HYLEG : SU
• ALCHOCODEN : MO 
• ANAERETE : SA

Morinus finds that ALMUTEN is JU. However, it is found that MA, JU and SA are in detriment in this theme.

1)- SA conj #MO (1552 PTO)

overall results - primary and mundane Rp
1	C Regio Campa	2
0	D Placidus	3
1	D Regio Campa
3	C Placidus
5
	1548,02
fictitious	C SA # MO	Dir
0	D – AR	0
0	AO	0
3	Gold Regio	3
1	Gold Placid	1
0	Symb	0
4
	Rp
fictitious		Dir
1	AR <--→ Campa	0
0	AO <----→ Regio	0
1	Symb <----→ Placid	0

Five primary directions, four fictitious. Year average 1548.02.

2)- MO conj #SA (1549)

- overall results - primary and mundane Rp

0	C Regio Campa	3
0	D Placidus	0
3	D Regio Campa
0	C Placidus
3
	1549,52
fictitious	C MO # SA	Dir
0	D – AR	0
0	AO	0
0	Gold Regio	0
0	Gold Placid	0
0	Symb	0
0
	Rp
fictitious		Dir
0	AR <--→ Campa	0
1	AO <----→ Regio	0
0	Symb <----→ Placid	0

We observe 3 directions Regio-Campa and 1 arc Rp ficitf (AO). I recall that this notion of fictitious method (in particular for the AO arcs ) is still in draft form.

3)- Rp MO || JU (1534)

Alessandro Farnese was Pope from 13 October 1534 to his death in 1549.

 

	RAPT PARALLEL
		promissor	significator
	Rp MO || JU	MO	|| JU	Control diff	MO motion
	dom Campa	44,892	115,702	-70,81	2,619
	dom Regio	53,474	109,552	+	MO lat
	Dom Placidus	58,746	106,164		5,073
Rp	Mid-point dom,	Mid-point L	dec	Oa	Rp ASC/DSC
Rp camp MO | || JU	80,30	65,840	21,34	42,99	65,24
	80,30	c
Rp regio MO | || JU	81,51	65,026	21,20	42,29	64,54
	81,51	c
Rp plac MO | || JU	82,45	66,679	21,49	43,71	65,96
	82,45	c

recall : the table shows the set of parallels according to the ASC-DSC axis and the MC-IC axis;
for the three main systems of houses (Campanus, Regio and Placidus); the method consists
by first computing the mundane mid-point between promissor and significator; then computing
the direction in AO with respect to the ASC or AR in relation to the MC. The corresponding
longitudes are also computed. The same computation is also made on control arcs, which are called fictitious methods. The results obtained are compared. For the comparison to be of good quality, it is necessary to wait for at least thirty matches matched. 

Be careful in this case to the fact that the Moon has a proper motion and a high latitude. If we take no latitude, the results vary a lot and if we take no proper motion, there is 0 result !

method	diff	Rp fictitious
AR	35,59	99,588
AO	34,69	77,002
SYMB	32,38	101,958

 The fictitious Rp is thus computed : for instance,  

Rp (AR) = (Arf-ARm)/2+Arm-{rai ; long_asc} ± 360 (if result < 0), 

where Arf and Arm are the RA of promissor and significator, rai ot long_asc are the AR of IC or ASC (depending on whether the Rp is rotated  to the ASC-DSC or MC-IC axis. We remove 360 ° if necessary. Hence, we see that, in this case Rp AR = 99.58°.
In this way, it is evident that there is always - for a given date - a rapt parallel between two points which can be computed.

The result is then compared between the two methods (DIR and fictitious) by using the key transformers. We use the mean of the result.
 

	Rp
fictitious		Dir
0	AR <--→ Campa	2
0	AO <----→ Regio	0
0	Symb <----→ Placid	3